Grant Bowler, True Blood’s Coot was recently interviewed by the New Zealand Herald.
Here’s an excerpt from that interview.
So, from Wolf West to a wolfman named Coot. You’ve lost the beard – what else has changed?
Well, I’m still acting for a living [but] I guess I live mainly in the States these days – that would be a change. And now I shoot films much more than I shoot television.
Is Coot the biker werewolf at all like Wolf West?
One’s named Wolf, one is a wolf. They are both more on the working class side of the equation than not, and they pretty much do what they want most of the time. So those would be the commonalities.
So what are the rules of your werewolf? Do you morph at the full moon?
Every time someone does vampires or werewolves or ghosties or whatever, the trickiest part is figuring out the rules and sticking to them, I guess. On True Blood there are times when werewolvess really, really want to shift – you know like maybe a full moon or whatever, they have a really strong desire to shift. But they can also shift at will.
Okay, so they are more like the Twilight ones then.
I don’t know. I’ve never seen Twilight.
Is there anything your werewolf has to avoid?
Apart from traffic cops and dog-catchers, no.
And how did Coot become a werewolf?
Basically the rule in True Blood is that the weres are like the pure-bloods of shifters. They are at the top of the food chain in terms of any creature that can shift. So for a were to be a were they have to have two were-parents.
Did I read somewhere that you like scenes where you get to bash people?
I said the older I got, the stranger I found it that the jobs I tend to get offered are jobs where I bash the guys and kiss girls – and that was fine with me.
Do you kiss girls on True Blood?
Yep, I get to kiss girls, terrorise people and get into a bit of biffo, so it’s a trifecta.
And when you do your transformations, how much is you and how much is done behind the scenes later, digitally?
Basically [creator] Alan Ball’s take on shifting is that the whole bones popping, hair growing out of the face kind of thing works in a movie because you do it twice maybe three times, but in a series you are looking at doing it 25, maybe 30 times. And so the whole way that weres shift in True Blood is based on wanting to get on with the bloody story, so we shift quite simply and quickly.
How does it compare to doing a show closer to reality like Outrageous Fortune or Ugly Betty?
I would put Outrageous Fortune right up there with True Blood for fantasy – do you really think with that bone-headed bunch we would have got away with any crime whatsoever? But how does it compare? It’s nice there is a real freedom in it, [away] from the bounds of having to justify normal behaviour.
To read the entire interview, go here.
12 fangbangers like this post.